The verb provide has two different subcategorisation frames: provide something [ to somebody] provide somebody with something In the first, the material provided is the object, in the second the recipient is the object. Both are valid, and both are in common use. The difference between them is the with phrase, which must be there to get meaning 2: if there is only one (direct) object, then ...
In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe. "Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way. You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.
The term "Mon" (spelt မန် in Mon and မွန် in Burmese), which is synonymous with the Burmese word for 'noble,' [21] was likely derived from Old Mon "rmeñ" by way of Middle Mon "rman" (ရာမန်). [22][17] The ethnonym "rmeñ" was first recorded in the Kyanzittha’s New Palace Inscription of AD 1102 in Myanmar.
MÓN NGON NHANH VÀ DỄ LÀM Play all Ăn là thích TÔM TRỨNG CÚT XÚC XÍCH XÀO BÔNG CẢI giòn đổi vị cực cuốn | MÓN NGON MỖI NGÀY "AJINOMOTO" Mon Ngon Moi Ngay 934 views2 ...
word choice - "provide" vs. "provide with" - English Language & Usage ...
Provide can be either transitive or intransitive. All of your sentences above appear correct (as provide can take both a direct and an indirect object, and the "with" may be implied, as in your 2nd sentence). 1 [ trans. ] make available for use; supply : these clubs provide a much appreciated service for this area. ( provide someone with) equip or supply someone with (something useful or ...